
Docshunter is a website that allows users to search through thousands of documents in various subjects and categories.
I led the UX design project, enhanced the design system and collaborated in a team with 1 project manager, 6 frontend and backend developers, 1 business analysis
Figma Prototype link can be found here
%2520copy.png)
.png)

To get started, I had the kick-off meeting in the team with project manager & developers to get to know about the current situation of the product and collect the user feedbacks. According to the meeting brief, there are some highlight requirements that need to be focused to update the application in the next launch.

Based on the visual & interaction perspectives, I identify a number of critical issues that Docshunter currently has.


The time is limited and we cannot resolve all the user feedbacks in a certain of time. Therefore, I need to priority the user needs and pain points. I utilise the MOSCOW framework to categories them into the one roadmap.


I conducted collaborative sessions with the Product Manager and other team members to finalise the userflow & changing proposals. We focused on mapping out the user flow to ensure the solution aligns cohesively with the searching tool.
The prototype is created using the available design system. I also enrich the design system with new elements and some minor changes.
Though more elements are developed and some small design changes are made, the design concept is still based on the brand identity & design system to keep the consistency of the product. The new version has received many positive feedbacks and is really generating an increasing number of users.



The mobile version has the limited space requires to have different design for the categories table interface.
I had a small workshop to conduct the A/B testing and present two designs that I made for the mobile application in order to identify which options that is more feasible in the perspective of the whole team.

After the discussing with the product manager & development team, we decided to go with the option A because of several reasons:


I was able to learn a lot about how to build a valuable website while still taking various viewpoints, screen sizes, and other considerations into account.
It can be considered more in the next phase
It encouraged me to think about what components the website should have. Eventually, I came up with an appropriate interface for the new functions.